Space, Kinship and Gender (ص 13)

غرض

عنوان

Space, Kinship and Gender (ص 13)

المحتوى

In order to go beyond the static analysis of typolos
classification or the purely morpho
a conceptual system of analysis which tr
aspects of the community (kinship relations, g
tenure, and belief systems) and
built environment. I
hierarchy of socio-cultural factors are seen as determinants in
ordering the
I have aimed at
developing sats the variou
ender segregation, land
relationship to the
built environment.
[t is arguec nat aliiirer
by different variables.
y variables often made _ the
environmental
levels were governec
cult task. For example at the
») it was nen’? more than any other factor
kinship was almost certainly not the determining factor in shaping
the built environment at the settle
of ecologica
ment level where a concentration
nd putative factors had
he upper hand.
[I therefore reject
both the formalistic approach which sees
vernacular architecture as objects d'art isolated from a specific
cultural context a which puts undue emphasis on the
criticality of the physical aspects of architecture (need f
shelter, climate, material, technology, etc.). The former is best
oxeuplstied in the work of B. Rudofsky, Architecture without
cts and the latter in F. Rugette, Architecture in
sanon (1974)« § Such approaches have failed in my view to ‘oxpiain how
nd the approac
ijildings or jf
acquire. It ignores the relation between a people's world view, the
ordering of their lives, and consequently the ordering of their
urthermore this study is neither chronologi
Classificatory in nature.
‘significance’ or ‘'meaning'!
environment.
thesis
leals with spaces at a level beyond
usages or their technologic Lweints _

هو جزء من

Space, Kinship and Gender

تاريخ

١٩٨٧

المنشئ

Suad Amiry

مجموعات العناصر

Generated Pages Set

Theses رسائل ماجستير ودكتوراه