From the Pages of the Defter (ص 207)

غرض

عنوان
From the Pages of the Defter (ص 207)
المحتوى
value and tax assessment. However, Gerber’s research did not shed light on the question
of who would have been liable for the taxes on lands that were not under tapu, and why its
registered taxpayers would not have obtained tapu certificates.”
Similar to Gerber, Martha Mundy and Richard Saumarez Smith, in their detailed study
of land registration and tenure in Transjordan from 1868, proffer that Ottoman protocol
assumed that a list of properties upon which tapu commissions could draw to determine
eligibility for tapu certificates would already have been drawn up for the tax office before a
3°6 If this was the case in the Hebron district, it is plausible that
tapu survey took place.
ownership in the two registers could have differed significantly. However, the evidence
presented in the 1895 court case indicates that tapu registration of Jamrura lands to twenty-
four individuals took place around the time of the Em/ak survey, which recorded just seven
individuals. The time-distance between the two documents was, at the most, eighteen
°* Ibid., 202, 206.
°° Further, comparing his findings about property-value and property-tax assessment surveys with the
1876 Esas-! Emlak for the rural areas of the Hebron subdistrict (gaza) raises a number of questions
unanswerable until further investigation can be carried out. The issues may be summarized here. First,
Gerber finds reference to at least three such surveys having been conducted in the Jerusalem gaza:
December 1868, February 1886, and sometime in 1907, the first one alone (understandably) called the
esas (fundamental) register: esas-i yoklama (p. 204). Second, the summary reports Gerber found
regarding the 1907 survey seemingly indicate that there was either an enormous difference in market-
rate land values between Jerusalem and Hebron rural areas, or an exponential increase in land values
between 1876 and 1907, or a combination of the two factors. Third, the summary reports appear to
indicate that some different units of evaluation were used in the Hebron and Jerusalem subdistricts of
the Jerusalem mutasarriflik, for example, the monetary evaluation of olive groves according to the
number of trees (in Hebron) or according to the number of dunams (in Jerusalem.) (See representative
records (for Lifta) presented by Gerber, pp. 204-205.)
°° Mundy and Saumarez-Smith (2007): see the detailed discussions of registration in Chapter 6, 9 and 10.
190
هو جزء من
From the Pages of the Defter
تاريخ
٢٠١٦
المنشئ
Susynne McElrone

Contribute

A template with fields is required to edit this resource. Ask the administrator for more information.

Not viewed