The Dispossession of the Peasantry (ص 149)

غرض

عنوان
The Dispossession of the Peasantry (ص 149)
المحتوى
133
cultivators and when available was certainly on small patches of land, what is not
clear is the extent of that reduction, its distribution and variation among different
districts, villages, and peasants; nor is it clear as to the extent of reduced
dependence of the peasants on moneylenders.
An inquiry with bankers on the extent of indebtedness of peasants to
moneylenders resulted in Jewish bankers maintaining that it was “negligible, ”
while Arab bankers saying it was “considerable.” At any rate, a decrease in the
“number” of indebted peasants may simply reflect the well-known situation where
peasants sold their land to pay off debts and became landless or nearly landless.
Another inquiry in 88 villages from among the [35 villages that had
cooperative credit societies found that most loans were taken from those societies.
Based on this, the situation is generalized to the whole country in asserting “that
the practice of borrowing from moneylenders is no longer followed by a
majority.”°° However, these villages are not representative of the whole country.
The very existence of such villages (i.e., having had cooperative societies that
offered loans on much easier terms than did moneylenders) naturally resulted in
peasants turning away from moneylenders. For the 963°’ remaining villages that
did not have cooperative societies, it is not clear as to the extent, if any, of
reduction in dependence on moneylenders, given that for a peasant to borrow from
“Tbid., 367.
"Abstract 1944/45, 273; for a list of villages see Sami Hadawi, Village
Statistics 1945; A Classification of Land and Area Ownership in Palestine (Beirut:
PLO Research Center, 1970), 40-70.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
تاريخ
٢٠٠٦
المنشئ
Riyad Mousa

Contribute

A template with fields is required to edit this resource. Ask the administrator for more information.

Not viewed